Bruna axle
The eccentricity of a planet orbit of the solar system

In the figure, we have the right-angled triangle AAnF´2. If we consider the side AAn as fixed in this triangle and increase the angle A, both distance D between the focus and the distance c between the focus and the center of ellipse would decrease. Thus the eccentricity (e) of ellipse was also been reduced, so that we have in an ellipse:
| A<90º: the focus of aphelion is located on the left side of the center of ellipse. | A=90º: the focus of aphelion coincides with the focus of perihelion and the ellipse changes into a circular orbit. |
A>90º: the focus of aphelion changes to the right side of the center of ellipse that cause that the angle A1- focus of aphelion- between the direction of the biggest semi-axle with the Bruna axle is always smaller than 90º. |
Then, we can conclude: In the orbit of any planet of the solar system, the angle A that the direction of aphelion forms with the Bruna axle is always less than 90º and if such angle was A = 90º, the orbit of such planet would be circular.
We must remember that the internal velocities of stars inside of a galaxy are much smaller in relation to its expansion velocities in the universe, so we can consider that the expansion velocity V of stars of a galaxy in the universe is almost the same as the galaxy’s expansion velocity.
Calculus of Bruna axle
A new scientific propose begins to have credibility as soon as its previsions are experimentally and observationally confirmed.
Base don the figures of this chapter, I could conclude that there is an axle in the universe – denominated by me as Bruna axle – in which the sun moves at its uniform expansion velocity V in the universe that is the same as our Milky Way.
The planets that compose the solar system follow such displacement and, at the same time, describe elliptic orbits around the sun.
An observer on the solar system referential does not know his expansion velocity V in the Universe and believes oneself to be standing still in relation to such velocity, seeing all planets describing orbits in a very define plane, which direction of aphelion of such elliptic orbits form an angle A with Bruna axle.
As we know the direction of each one of these aphelion in relation to a coordinates system, as an example – the ecliptic coordinate system- we can prove through them that our theory is right. Let’s simulate in a spreadsheet the calculus of all angles A of planets for verifying if there is an axle in the universe that is according to my theory, where any planet will not have an angle bigger than 90º. In addition, we will define the value of expansion velocity V in the universe that has to be the same for each orbit and will influence in the functioning of light and gravity.
First phase:
Calculus of Bruna axle direction
Data of planets´ orbit.
We have used the ecliptic coordinates system xyz, where the coordinate xy are on the plane of elliptic and the coordinate x is in direction of Nodal point.
angle
angle of Bruna axle with Z axle;
angle ![]()
angle that the projection of Bruna axle on plane XY makes with X axle;
angle A
angle that Bruna axle forms with its projection in the axle of perihelion of planet.
We made an electronic spreadsheet with data of direction of perihelion of eight planets in the systems XYZ and changed the Bruna axle, varying angles
and
.
For each position of Bruna axle, we calculated the angle A for each planet and through many experiments, we have tried to find the position of Bruna axle, where the angle A was anticipated by Logical Deductions. We have found for the value of A:
A < 90 º for all planets.
Varying
and
from 0 º to 360 º , we could conclude that there is, in the space, a place that fits well the conditions determined by Logical Deductions for Bruna axle, as following:
= 3,6 º
= 275,35 º
Look at the spreadsheet below:
Such data gives the following coordinates for Bruna axle:
|
|
Longitude |
Latitude |
|
- in the system of ecliptic coordinates |
275o21’ ± 18’ |
e 86o24’ ± 1’48" |
|
- in the system of gallatic coordinates |
92o15’36" ± 18’ |
e 29o24’36" ± 1’48" |
|
- and, in the system of equatorial coordinates |
270o43’48" ± 18’ |
e 62o58’12" ± 1’48" |
- Adicionar novo comentário
- Versão para impressão
- 33 leituras