Increase of the magnetic field to keep the particles in a circular trajectory inside of accelerator.

For Science
For keeping a particle in its circular trajectory inside of accelerator we need to exert a magnetic force originated by the field B acting over a charged particle P, given by

Fm must be equal to the centrifuge force Fc that will only appears due to the deflection of the particle’s trajectory inside of accelerator stimulated by the magnetic field, so that, when v c , B .

For Logical Deductions

The magnetic source A emits particles mediators of magnetic energy in all directions at velocity of light c, at the moment that a particle P is on P position between A and B. The particle P which is inside of accelerator acquires velocity v and finds a particle mediator of magnetic force that was emitted from A on the P₁ point creating an angle with its trajectory P P₁ and exerting the magnetic force Fm in a direction perpendicular to the trajectory of the particle P on the P₁ position.
If the velocity v was null(v = 0), the particle mediator of force Fm would find the particle P on P position forming a angle of 90º with the trajectory of the particle P and traveling the trajectory AP at a velocity c in a time t₀.
If v > 0, the mediator particle will reach the particle P on P₁ position forming a angle with the P P₁ trajectory and traveling the AP₁ trajectory at velocity c in a time t.
A this same time t , the particle P goes from P position toward P₁ position at velocity v. Thus, solving the triangle APP₁ we will find the formula:

we see that:

Substituting in [4] the value of t given above, we will have:

The magnetic force

Finally, substituting (6) in (7), we will have:

If v c, we have it through the formula (6)

being that sen 0, logo 0, and due to it, Fm 0.
Based on the reasoning above we conclude that a magnetic field generated inside of accelerator for keeping the particle P in its circular orbit will have to be intensified to compensate the bad efficiency of the accelerator through the diminution of Fm (Fm 0) when v c.
The mass M does not increase as in Logical Deductions, it is always constant.

Thus, the magnetic field B will have to increase as if the mass would increase in the same proportion to obey the expression Fcentrífuge = Fmagnetic. However, the mass does not grow but the efficiency of the field drops does requiring its intensification due to the increase of the electric current in the coil of the accelerator, so that, when v c it is necessary to increase the electric current to infinite which limits the acceleration capacity of particles inside of accelerator.
We must remember again that “Logical Deductions” affirms that the mathematic of relativity is right but the interpretations of the results are wrong. Thus, we have jus improved them giving new interpretations well-founded on logical, such as in the example above, which mentions the motion of particles inside of accelerators. Como a Ciência explica o funcionamento dos aceleradores de partículas?
Science still believing that mass of particle grows with the increase of the velocity inside of accelerators. Thus, a part of energy provided by accelerator during the acceleration of particle changes into its kinetic energy, with the rest of them is used for the increase of its mass.
According to the formula E=m, your grandfather agrees that energy materialize in mass. Inclusively, in his pattern of Universe, the Big Bang produced just pure energy that materialized in many levels of particles in a slow process that endured around 300.000 years to have the pure energy changed into atoms. Therefore, it is impossible to change an impure energy into substance and neither into a substance in an instantaneous way.
The Science can disagree with what we have just related and affirm that due to the photon of gamma ray is a pure energy it declines in electron and positron (electron with positive charge) instantaneously. In the other hand, I know that according to the theories of your grandfather Geraldo Cacique, the photon has mass and represents just the visible light and other radiations are represented by other mediators particles. Thus, it is possible that a photon of a gamma ray is a particle composed of two particles of the same mass, in other words, the electron and the positron. Hence, the energy is not changed into two particles instantaneously it is just a particle that declines in both of those.
In the other hand, the science that considers the increase of mass concluded the magnetic force used in the accelerators for keeping the particles in its circular trajectories balancing the centrifuge force would need to grow to the infinite when the velocity of particle tends to the velocity of light c.
Let’s compare both mathematics of Geraldo Cacique and Einstein that are use in the functioning of accelerators.

The logical Deductions explanations for the functioning of accelerators are much simpler, logical and acceptable than that one given by Science. Besides that, the mathematic used by your grandfather is compatible with what happens with particles inside of accelerators and it is the same as that one used by Science. The difference is in the interpretation.
I am explaining those thinks because I do not want the readers that have their own physics knowledge contradict my theory.
I am pretending to reformulate physics because there are mistakes in it. Then, it is not prudence for Science uses just the interpretations that they consider as correct to refute Logical Deduction theories.
The people are not prepared to accept new interpretations for that they had already established as right so, they refute them without even know them well.
Logical Deductions gives new interpretations for explaining many questions that are solved by science through relativity; however, we have a question: Why any physicist was not able to detect the relativity mistakes during a century?
It is just because they have always looked for mistakes in the restrict mathematic but there is no mistake in it; in addition, the questions in light relativity are just about calculus of the length of trajectories L covered by photons, where
L = c x t,
being t constant and c the velocity of light which was modified with its source velocity, but, if we consider c as constant and modify the time t in the same proportion that we change c in the formula above, the result
L = c x t,
will be mathematically the same. Thus, the mathematic results of restrict mathematic are corrects confirming many tests made by physicists.
I always hear physicists saying that the best theory to explain the Universe is the einstenian pattern which is totally mathematic and its results confer with observational data of astromers. It happens due to these results are valid and confirm the veracity of Einstein’s theory in the presence of the science community. However, they provide a wrong interpretation for these results. I will give you a Daniel example: When physicists used the time dilatation and contraction of space they inferred the existence of fourth dimension. They must have concluded that the light ray and the line of gravity make curves in the space, but, to describe such effects in the fourth dimension that is impossible to be imagined, they interpret that the trajectories of photons make curves affirming that if we have a great vision and look ahead the light would make a curve that would allow us to see our own nape!
The physicists interpret the curvature of the line of gravity as if it could bend the space which is impossible to be understood by common person.
When physicists affirm that they understand the curvature of space they are reasoning in mathematic terms interpreting the equations of einsteinian theory. Thus, according to these equations, the universe can have a shape of a sphere a plan and even a saddle which will depend on value of critical density of matter that is introduced in these equations. For solving these equations it is necessary to have a very deep knowledge about mathematic of tensor and differential geometry which is known by few mathematicians. Therefore, just a few physicists are able to work with the general relativity of Einstein.
The Logical Relativity eliminated the time dilatation and fourth dimension which allow us to understand about the functioning of the dynamic of universe due to when we reasoning in only tree dimensions we can use a simple mathematic. Thus, physicists think that just them through their mathematic knowledge are able to understand the cosmologic phenomena; and also it is impossible that a person without those knowledge makes a theory that operates as well as Logical Deductions.