How I have created Logical Deductions´ theory new

Through the consistencies presented in the spreadsheet of real and visible universes:
- Internal;
- among themselves;
- with data provided by Astronomy: the calculus of Hubble constant and Deep radiation.
We can consider that they are right; it means that such concepts used in the interpretations are also right. Thus, photons are influenced by speeds of their sources for the observer in the absolute space, there was Big Bang, and there is no limit for the speed of bodies (galaxies), because if there was such limit it would not be possible to have visible universes.
You must remember that light of stars is always emitted by anyone in the same way, it means:
- at constant speed c;
- at the same frequency f = 5,8928 x 1014 Hz;
- at the same wave’s length l = 5,0905 x 10-7 m.
The wave’s length remains constant in the transmission of light, as the speed as frequency varies in relation to the deviation speed of source in its arrival. Therefore, as such new concepts place opposite to those already established by physics, we concluded that: “The basic principle of Science are real, our theories or “Logical deduction theories are right; therefore, physics is wrong”.
According to such conclusion, as the author of “Logical Deductions” had any other alternative, he had to look for any deficiency in physics´ theories for becoming them compatible to my universe pattern. Thus, although I am not physics, I had to study relativity for finding out such deficiencies.
It is possible to explain better the functioning of light through a simple and logical reasoning, comprehending its duality, it means, light might be transmitted in space, being wave and particle at the same time, which had never been explained by Science. Based on such new concepts about light, it is easier to give a new interpretation for the experience of Michelson-Morley, which supports the theory of relativity confirming that speed of light does not depend on speed of its source. Such experience that was made to confirm the existence of ether has proved that there is no ether. However, it was used to confirm that light´s speed is always constant and it is not influenced by Earth´s speed. For “Logical Deductions” such result was foreseen, because the equipment and the light source were on the same reference –Earth. Such influence of Earth´s motion over the light´s speed of sources located on it could just be detected by an observer on the absolute space reference frame. When I deduced the same formula for the time of Relativity using just one clock, I verified that the whole experiences able to confirm the veracity of time dilatation are right, but the interpretation given by Einstein is incorrect.

The time is absolute. In the formula of relativity, the time t bigger than to is not due to the clock, which marked time t, works faster that that one, which marked to into motion. The right interpretation is that speed (v) of light source in such formula causes that the length of photon’s trajectory is bigger that that one in which the source is at rest.
For example:
The relativity and atomic clocks.
The atomic clocks are controlled or compared by central through radio’s waves. NIST in United States, LPTF in France and PTB in Germany.

Two atomic clocks, one located on the first floor of a building and the other one on the last floor, will have different orbital speeds due to the Earth´s rotation, where:
V1 – Speed of clock 1;
V2 – Speed of clock 2;
D – Difference of level between them;
R1 – clock 1 on the last floor;
R2 – clock 2 on the first floor;
V=v1-v2 – relative speed between both clocks.

For Science

The clock R1 has a relative speed v in relation to clock R2. Due to restrict relative and such speed v, Science affirms that clock R1 moves more slowly than R2. Being that the time measured by radio’s wave that connects both clocks for comparing times measured between them, covers the trajectory R1R2 of length D in a time:

• to, measured by clock R1;
• t, measured by clock R2.

Science affirms that such difference will be equal to the difference between two clocks R1 and R2.
Certainly, it will happen when atomic clocks have an exactness that allows us to measure such difference. They are not so exact yet.
Science also affirms that gravity influences such difference Dt.

For Logical Deduction

Time is absolute.

The observer S would see that radio’s wave is emitted by clock R1 on position R´1 and reaches clock R2 when it is on position R2.
In a time t measured by clock of observer on Earth or by observer, both clocks move at the same way so that time is absolute, he would see that:

• Clock R1 goes from position R´1 toward R1, covering distance E at speed v;
• Clock R2 goes from position R´2 toward R2;
• Radio’s wave goes from R´1 toward R2 covering trajectory L at speed c.

The radio’s wave upon arriving at R2 due to due to the speed v1 of such clock and the aberration effect has its speed changed to R´R2as it had covered the direction R1R2.
But if Earth did not have its rotation motion the speed v=0, so the wave would have covered the trajectory R1R2 of length D at speed at speed c in a time to. If we solve the triangle R´1R1R2 we will find the same formula of time of relativity. Let’s observe it:

where:
t= time that electromagnetic wave of radio takes to cover the trajectory L at speed’s light c;
to= time that electromagnetic wave of radio takes to cover trajectory D at speed of light c.
being the difference Δt:

The difference between modern physics and “Logical Deductions” is just the interpretation of facts.
In this example of atomic clocks, t > to, it is not because one clock works slower than the other one as relativity affirms, but it is just because the trajectory L covered by wave, when v is different from 0, is bigger than the trajectory D, when v=0. Thus, L>D, so we will have t > to.
Logical Deductions also affirms that gravity influences Dt.
For Science the interpretation of the difference Dt between two atomic clocks is accumulative, because both clocks always move at different speeds. For Logical Deductions, such difference is not accumulative. Thus, atomic clocks located in different latitude and altitude will be always right. If it was different, it would be impossible to have a time standard, because all clocks would move in a different way in function of their speeds that vary in accordance with latitude, altitude and also with the planet that they are located in.
Therefore, in a near future, when many vehicles will have automatic pilots and the routes that will have to be described precisely in the interplanetary trips, physics does not need to worry about that because they will have an exact time standard for driving their ships, which would be very hard is relativity was right.
Dear reader, Stop, Think and find the best interpretation
1) Is there a time dilatation?
or
2) The time t > t0 because L > D.
We must remember that:

- In Logical Deductions, the light or electromagnetic waves, for an observer on the same frame of reference, in this case on Earth, always works at the same speed c as in relativity.
- the formula of time of Relativity,

was deduced over a right-angled triangle, thus it is just valid when applied in a right-angled triangle.
As in the case of atomic triangles, I had to give convincing interpretations for all those phenomena solved by Relativity using the time dilatation and proving that:

• time is absolute;
• the mathematic of relativity is right, its interpretation using the time dilatation that is wrong.

I have just improved relativity using the formula of time for just one clock and excluding the time dilatation. I have also made physics easier to be understood when I eliminated the contraction of space and the fourth dimension. Besides that I have excluded the dependence of mass on speed. Thus, I made physics to become more compatible to my universe pattern.
When I presumed that gravitational energy is transmitted as luminous energy, forming the energetron as a particle mediator of gravity that propagates at light´s speed, i have solved one problem in my theory. Such problems consisted in explaining how expansion speeds of galaxies are uniform and were not influenced by gravity of others.
As energetrons are influenced by speed of their sources on emission and due to Aberration effect and speed of their receivers, they change their direction of action of gravity force between bodies when there is a relative motion between them, which is different from Newtonian gravitational force, which acts always in the same direction of axle that connects center of gravity to the bodies.

Gravity force between two bodies A and B when there is a relative motion v between them.

Such Idea helped us to solve many questions that were not solved by Science yet, as an example, the materialization of energy for forming fundamental particles; the explanation about fictitious forces that are responsible for circular motion in balance between gravitational and centrifugal forces in planet’s orbits and between subatomic particles.
I have done a big improvement in Science. Such change will make physics more attractive and accessible due to it uses a simple mathematic skill. Besides, if you have more knowledge about basic principals that rule the functioning of nature’s laws you will be able to make many technological innovations.

The opposition of Science’s doctors to new concepts.

My biggest difficult was to encourage physics to read “Logical Deductions” theories. It happens because in the beginning of the lecture they read that light is influenced by speed of its source, thus they do not continue reading it. They do not even think about such theory. They can not accept it because if they agree with such theory they would have to accept that relativity is wrong and it is unacceptable for them.
However, if they read the whole theories they would see that I have just improved relativity, showing that formula of time is right and it can be deduced considering just the observer on the light´s source reference, which causes we use just one clock. Thus, we eliminate time dilatation, contraction of spaces, fourth dimension and mass dependent on speed.
The formula of time is right, which proves the veracity of relativity, but the interpretation given for results obtained by relativity is wrong. Thus, the most important is to lead them to read ‘Logical Deductions”, thus they will be convinced through its content.